4.1 Article

Measurement of the physical properties of aerosols in a fullerene factory for inhalation exposure assessment

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15459620802050053

Keywords

engineered nanomaterials; morphology; size distribution; nanoparticle; ultrafine particle

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Assessment of human exposure is important for the elucidation of potential health risks. However, there is little information available on particle number concentrations and number size distributions, including those of nanoparticles, in the working environments of factories producing engineered nanomaterials. The authors used a scanning mobility particle sizer and an optical particle counter to measure the particle number size distributions of particles ranging in diameter (Dp) from 10 nm to 5000 nm in a fullerene factory and used scanning electron microscopy to examine the morphology of the particles. Comparisons of particle size distributions and morphology during non-work periods, during work periods, during an agitation process, and in the nearby outdoor air were conducted to identify the sources of the particles and to determine their physical properties. A modal diameter of 25 nm was found in the working area during the non-work period; this result was probably influenced by ingress of outdoor air. During the removal of fullerenes from a storage tank for bagging and/or weighing, the particle number concentration at Dp50 nm was no greater than that in the non-work period, but the concentration at Dp1000 nm was greater during the non-work period. When a vacuum cleaner was in use, the particle number concentration at Dp50 nm was greater than that during the non-work period, but the concentration at Dp1000 nm was no greater. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that the coarse particles emitted during bagging and/or weighing were aggregates/agglomerates of fullerenes; although origin of particles with Dp50 nm is unclear.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available