4.7 Article

The role of diet in the metabolism of daidzein by human faecal microbiota sampled from Italian volunteers

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUTRITIONAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages 940-947

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2008.08.006

Keywords

Daidzein; Diet; Equol; Human; In vitro metabolism; LC-MS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The intestinal microbial transformation of daidzein into equol is subject to a wide inter-individual variability. The aim of this study was to investigate in vitro this transformation and to evaluate possible correlations between individual diet and equol production. The transformation of daidzein was investigated in anaerobic batch cultures inoculated with mixed fecal bacteria from 90 volunteers. The daidzein metabolism was monitored by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, and a chiral column was used to distinguish equol and dihydrodaidzein enantiomers. The obtained results show that daidzein was unchanged (approximate to 27%) or degraded to equol (approximate to 28%), O-desmethylangolensin (approximate to 12%) or dihydrodaidzein (approximate to 31%). Furthermore, some subjects (approximate to 2%) are able to produce both equol and O-desmethylangolensin. Bacteria represent sub-dominant populations (10(5)-10(9) cell/g wet faeces) in slow equol producers, while higher counts of equol-producing microorganisms (10(10)-10(11) cell/g wet faeces) were found in quick equol producers. The in vitro test to evaluate equol-producing status is quick and not invasive, and the obtained results are comparable with those reported in vivo. Indeed, the only enantiomer present in the batch cultures containing equol was the S-form. No significant correlations between equol production, BMI, age and sex were found. It seems that the equol-producer group consumed less fibre, vegetables and cereals, and more lipids from animal sources. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available