4.6 Article

BETTER COGNITIVE AND PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE IS ASSOCIATED WITH HIGHER BLOOD PRESSURE IN CENTENARIANS

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION HEALTH & AGING
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages 618-622

Publisher

SPRINGER FRANCE
DOI: 10.1007/s12603-011-0334-8

Keywords

Centenarians; cognitive function; activities of daily living; blood pressure; sIcam-1; sVcam-1; sP-selectin; sCD40L; VEGF

Funding

  1. Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland [NN-2-268/06, KNW-2-045/08, KNW-2-022/09]
  2. Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Poland [N 404 535439]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: knowledge of rational, evidence based health care in the hundred-year-old is still poor. The aim of the study was to evaluate health and functional state in hundred-year-old inhabitants of upper Silesia, Poland, with a focus on the heart and vascular function. Participants: medical and nursing assessment at places of residence was performed in thirty five 100.7+/- 1.4 (mean+/-SD) year-old subjects, 28 women, and 7 men. Measurements: The protocol included mini-mental State examination (MMSE), Barthel index (BI) and laboratory tests. A telephone follow-up was performed 180 days after the initial examination. Results: most subjects had increased systolic blood pressure (BP), diminished albumin and folate serum levels as well as decreased Glomerular Filtration rate. According to the quadratic polynomial regression model MMSE and BI were dependent on BP. Higher BP was associated with better performance and survival. Those who survived more than 180 days had lower levels of CRP and VCAM-1 and higher level of sCD40L. Conclusion: The relationships between functional scales, survival and blood pressure suggest a beneficial effect of elevated BP on both mental and physical performance in centenarians. Further studies should determine an optimal balance between risk and benefits of elevated blood pressure in the oldest old people.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available