4.6 Article

NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT IN AN ASIAN NURSING HOME AND ITS ASSOCIATION WITH MORTALITY

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION HEALTH & AGING
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 23-28

Publisher

SPRINGER FRANCE
DOI: 10.1007/s12603-010-0005-1

Keywords

Nutrition; mortality; MNA; nursing home

Funding

  1. National Healthcare Group, Singapore

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To study the nutritional status of nursing home residents in a multi-racial Asian society and its role in predicting short-term mortality independent of functional status and comorbidities. Design: Cross-sectional study with prospective collection of mortality data. Setting: Nursing home facility in Singapore. Subjects: A total of 154 patients (mean age 77 +/- 12 years, 53.2% women). Methods: We evaluated the demographic details, Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) scores, body mass index (BMI) and anthropometric measurements of the participants. Functional status and comorbidities were characterized by the modified Barthel Index and Charlson's comorbidity index respectively. Results: Prevalence of undernutrition were 52% (n=80) and 39% (n=60) when determined by BMI <18.5kg/m(2) and MNA <17 respectively. Mortality was 25.3% (n=39) over 2 years. Baseline factors associated with mortality include increased age, low Barthel's score, BMI <18.5kg/m(2) and MNA <17 (OR=1.05, 1.01, 3.08 and 3.03 respectively, all p<0.05). The association between low BMI and mortality remained significant (p=0.027) after adjustment for patient's age, gender, Barthel's and Charlson's scores, and prior nutritional intervention, but the association between MNA and mortality was diminished (p=0.106). Conclusion: There was a high prevalence of undernutrition in this nursing home population, and the diagnosis is an important predictor of mortality. Formal nutritional screening and targeted interventions may improve important clinical outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available