4.1 Article

Front-of-Package References to Fiber on Foods in Canadian Supermarkets Highlight the Need for Increased Nutrition Knowledge Among Consumers

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION EDUCATION AND BEHAVIOR
Volume 45, Issue 6, Pages 518-524

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2013.02.003

Keywords

nutrition labeling; nutrition literacy; dietary fiber; nutrition-related marketing; front-of-package

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP -102655]
  2. Ontario Graduate Scholarship
  3. Canadian Institutes of Health Research Doctoral Research Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To assess the nature of the guidance on fiber, a nutrient for which many Canadians' intakes are suboptimal, provided by manufacturers' use of front-of-package references on food in Canadian supermarkets. Design/Setting: Survey of all prepackaged food sold in 3 large supermarkets in Toronto. Variables Measured: Front-of-package references to fiber and other forms of nutrition-related marketing were recorded from all products. For a subsample of breads, Nutrition Facts table information was also collected. Analysis: Descriptive statistics; t test. Results: Front-of-package references to fiber were found on 6% of all foods, but large proportions of high fiber foods bore no front-of-package references to fiber. Many foods making a reference to fiber (17%) are foods to limit, according to Canada's Food Guide. Front-of-package references to fiber were declared in at least 30 different ways, and 31% used unregulated language. Among breads, use of regulated language was associated with higher fiber content. Conclusions and Implications: Consumers may be faced with challenges in seeking out healthful sources of fiber in the grocery store, given the complexity of existing front-of-package nutrition-related marketing and limited references to fiber in some categories. This work suggests that current nutritionrelated marketing cannot function as a substitute for nutrition education.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available