4.1 Article

The Selection and Prevalence of Natural and Fortified Calcium Food Sources in the Diets of Adolescent Girls

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION EDUCATION AND BEHAVIOR
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages 96-102

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2010.02.016

Keywords

calcium; dairy food; calcium-fortified food; adolescent; nutrition surveillance

Funding

  1. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [HD36601]
  2. National Institute of Nursing Research [NR004336]
  3. National Dairy Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To assess the impact of calcium-fortified food and dairy food on selected nutrient intakes in the diets of adolescent girls. Design: Randomized controlled trial, secondary analysis. Setting and Participants: Adolescent girls (n = 149) from a midwestern metropolitan area participated in randomized controlled trials of bone physiology from 1997 to 2008. Intervention: Subjects randomly assigned to a high-calcium (HC) diet supplying 1,500 mg calcium/d, or their usual diet (UC). Main Outcome Measures: Dietary intake was assessed from 3-day food records and calcium intakes categorized by food source. Food group composites, representing calcium-fortified and dairy food categories, were examined for their relative nutrient contributions. Student t tests were used to evaluate differences in selected nutrient intakes between the 2 study groups. Results: Dairy food contributed 68% of the total mean 1,494 mg calcium/d in the HC group, and calcium-fortified food contributed 304 mg calcium. In the UC group, dairy food contributed 69% of the total mean 765 mg calcium/d and calcium-fortified food contributed 50 mg calcium. Nutrient profiles of the dairy composites differed significantly from the calcium-fortified composites (P < .05). Conclusions and Implications: Dairy food was the primary source of calcium selected by these adolescent girls; calcium-fortified food augmented calcium intakes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available