4.1 Article

Examining the Relationship Between Family Meal Frequency and Individual Dietary Intake: Does Family Cohesion Play a Role?

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION EDUCATION AND BEHAVIOR
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages 229-235

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2010.03.009

Keywords

family meals; family cohesion; diet; mediation analysis

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [1U54CA116849, R21CA137240]
  2. National Cancer Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To confirm previously reported associations between family meal frequency and dietary intake, and to examine family cohesion as a potential mediator of this relationship. Design: Cross-sectional observational study. Data collected at baseline via questionnaire. Setting: Randomized, controlled household weight gain prevention trial. Participants: Participants were 152 adults and 75 adolescents from 90 community households. Variables Measured: Family meal frequency assessed with a single question. Perceived family cohesion measured by the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale-III. Usual intake of targeted food items assessed with modified food frequency questionnaire. Analysis: Hierarchical linear regression with mediation analysis. Statistical significance set at alpha-level .05. Results: Family meal frequency was associated with intake of fruits and vegetables in adults, and sweets and sugar-sweetened beverages in adolescents. Family meal frequency was positively correlated with perceived family cohesion (r = 0.41, P < .01). Partial mediation by family cohesion was observed for family meal frequency and sweets intake in adolescents. Conclusions and Implications: Results suggest that family cohesion is not a consistent mediator of relationship between family meal frequency and individual dietary intake. Future studies should assess additional plausible mediators of this relationship in order to better understand the effect of family meals on dietary intake.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available