4.6 Article

Biofortification of Pearl Millet with Iron and Zinc in a Randomized Controlled Trial Increases Absorption of These Minerals above Physiologic Requirements in Young Children

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 143, Issue 9, Pages 1489-1493

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3945/jn.113.176677

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. HarvestPlus [8207, 8208]
  2. NIH [K24DK083772]
  3. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) [15205]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Millet is unusually drought resistant and consequently there is a progressive increase in the use of these grains as a human food staple, especially in large areas of India and sub-Saharan Africa. The purpose of this study was to determine the absorption of iron and zinc from pearl millet biofortified with 2 micronutrients that are typically deficient in nonfortified, plant-based diets globally. The study was undertaken in 40 children aged 2 y in Karnataka, India (n = 21 test/19 controls). Three test meals providing similar to 84 +/- 17 g dry pearl millet flour were fed on a single day for zinc and 2 d for iron between 0900 and 1600 h. The quantities of zinc and iron absorbed were measured with established stable isotope extrinsic labeling techniques and analyses of duplicate diets. The mean (+/- SD) quantities of iron absorbed from test and control groups were 0.67 +/- 0.48 and 0.23 +/- 0.15 mg/d, respectively (P < 0.001). The quantities of zinc absorbed were 0.95 +/- 0.47 and 0.67 +/- 0.24 mg/d, respectively (P = 0.03). These data did not include absorption of the modest quantities of iron and zinc contained in snacks eaten before and after the 3 test meals. In conclusion, quantities of both iron and zinc absorbed when iron and zinc biofortified pearl millet is fed to children aged 2 y as the major food staple is more than adequate to meet the physiological requirements for these micronutrients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available