4.6 Article

Maternal Weight and Body Composition during Pregnancy Are Associated with Placental and Birth Weight in Rural Bangladesh

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 142, Issue 11, Pages 2010-2016

Publisher

AMER SOC NUTRITION-ASN
DOI: 10.3945/jn.112.163634

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  2. NIH [T32HD046405]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Placental growth is a strong predictor of fetal growth, but little is known about maternal predictors of placental growth in malnourished populations. Our objective was to investigate in a prospective study the associations of maternal weight and body composition [total body water (TBW) estimated by bioelectrical impedance and fat and fat-free mass derived from upper arm fat and muscle areas (UAFA, UAMA)] and changes in these with placental and birth weights. Within a cluster-randomized trial of maternal micronutrient supplementation, a subsample of 350 women was measured 3 times across gestation. Longitudinal analysis was used to examine independent associations of similar to 10-wk measurements and similar to 10-20 wk and similar to 20-32 wk changes with birth outcomes. Weight, TBW, and UAMA, but not UAFA, at similar to 10 wk were each positively and independently associated with placental weight and birth weight (P < 0.05). Of the maternal similar to 10-20 wk changes in measurements, only TBW change and placental weight, and maternal weight and birth weight were positively associated (P < 0.05). Gains in weight, TBW, and UAMA from 20 to 32 wk were positively and UAFA gain was negatively associated with placental weight (P <= 0.01). Gains in weight and UAMA from 20 to 32 wk were positively associated with birth weight (P <= 0.01). Overall, higher maternal weight and measures of fat-free mass at similar to 10 wk gestation and gains from 20 to 32 wk are independently associated with higher placental and birth weight. J. Nutr. 142: 2010-2016, 2012.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available