4.6 Article

Dietary Patterns Are Associated with Different Indexes of Adiposity and Obesity in an Urban Mexican Population

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 141, Issue 5, Pages 921-927

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3945/jn.110.132332

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia [87783]
  2. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social [2005-785-012]
  3. Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Mexico [1860/2004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Our objective was to evaluate the relationships between dietary patterns and obesity, abdominal obesity, and high body fat proportion measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; >25% in men and >35% in women) in an urban Mexican population. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis with the baseline data from 6070 men and women aged 20-70 y participating in the Health Workers Cohort Study, including information on participants socio-demographic status and physical activity collected via self-administered questionnaires. Dietary intake was evaluated using a 116-item FFQ. Anthropometric measures were obtained using standardized procedures. We used factor analysis to identify 3 major dieary patterns: prudent, Westernized, and high animal protein/fat. We found that participants in the highest quintile of the prudent pattern were less likely to have high-body fat proportion (OR, 0.82; 95% Cl: 0.70-0.98) and that participants in the highest quintile of the Westernized pattern had greater odds for obesity (OR, 1.46; 95% Cl: 1.23-1.73), abdominal obesity (OR, 1.64; 95% Cl: 1.37-1.96), and high-body fat proportion (OR, 1.17:95% Cl: 1.01-1.35). Additionally, participants in the upper quintile of the high-animal protein/-fat pattern had greater odds of being obese (OR, 1.23:95% Cl: 1.06-1.42). These results indicate that the dietary patterns of Mexican adults are associated with different levels of adiposity and obesity. Further prospective studies are required to confirm these associations. J. Nutr. 141: 921-927, 2011.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available