4.6 Article

A DXA-Based Mathematical Model Predicts Midthigh Muscle Mass from Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Typically Developing Children but Not in Those with Quadriplegic Cerebral Palsy

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 140, Issue 12, Pages 2260-2265

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.3945/jn.110.126219

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [HD050530]
  2. National Osteoporosis Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Valid methods for assessing regional muscle mass in children are needed The aim of this study was to determine whether dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) can accurately estimate midthigh muscle mass from MRI (muscle(MRI)) in typically developing children and children with quadriplegic cerebral palsy (CP) A mathematical model predicting muscle(MRI) from midthigh fat-free soft tissue mass from DXA (FFSTDXA) was developed using 48 typically developing children (6-13 y) and was validated using the leave one-out method The model was also tested in children with quadriplegic CP (n = 10) The model produced valid estimates of midthigh muscle mass (muscle(DXA)) in typically developing children as indicated by a very strong relationship between muscle(DXA) and muscle(MRI), (r(2) = 0 95 SEE = 68 g P < 0 001) no difference in muscle(DXA) and muscle(MRI) (P = 0 951) and visual examination using a Bland-Altman plot Muscle(DXA) was very strongly related to muscle(MRI), in children with CP (r(2) = 0 96 SEE = 54 g P < 0 001) however muscle(DXA) overestimated muscle(MRI) by 15% (P = 0 006) The overestimation of muscle(MRI), by muscle(DXA) was strongly related to the lower ratio of muscle(MRI), to FFSTDXA (muscle(MRI)/FFSTDXA) in children with CP (r(2) = 075 P = 0001) The findings suggest that the DXA-based mathematical model developed in the current study can accurately estimate midthigh muscle mass in typically developing children However a population-specific model that takes into account the lower muscle(MRI)/FFSTDXA is needed to estimate midthigh muscle mass in children with quadriplegic CP J Nutr 140 2260-2265 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available