4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Emerging Research on Equol and Cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 140, Issue 7, Pages 1369S-1372S

Publisher

AMER SOC NUTRITIONAL SCIENCE
DOI: 10.3945/jn.109.118323

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA097366, R01 CA120560] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mechanisms of action of equol described using in vitro studies suggest possible effects of this compound in relation to cancer risk. However, experimental data are lacking with regard to the effects of S-(-)-equol (a gut bacterial product of daidzein), racemic equol, or even daidzein on tumorigenesis in vivo. Rodent studies, using racemic equol or daidzein in equol-producing animals, suggest that equol exposure does not stimulate mammary tumor growth, but there is little evidence that it is protective either. Racemic equol has been shown to inhibit skin carcinogenesis in hairless mice. Epidemiologic studies of associations between urinary or plasma isoflavone concentrations and breast cancer risk in women have reported no association nor increased risk associated with higher equol measures in low-soy consuming populations but have reported a trend toward decreased cancer risk with increased equol in Asian populations. These population-based differences have been reported for prostate cancer too. Several studies in Asian men report lower equol concentrations or a lower prevalence of equol-producers among men with prostate cancer compared with controls, whereas studies in European populations report no association. Studies using intermediate biomarkers of cancer risk and susceptibility in humans also have examined the effects the equol-producer phenotype in relation to soy intake with varying results. Overall, the role of equol in relation to cancer remains unclear. With the availability of R- and S-equol, animal studies of carcinogenesis and human intervention studies addressing effects of the equol enantiomers on intermediate biomarkers may help to ascertain the role of equol in cancer risk. J. Nutr. 140: 1369S-1372S, 2010.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available