4.6 Article

Mathematical Modeling of Serum 13C-Retinol in Captive Rhesus Monkeys Provides New Insights on Hypervitaminosis A

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 139, Issue 10, Pages 2000-2006

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3945/jn.109.111922

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIHNIDDK61973
  2. Wisconsin National Primate Research Center [5P51RR000167]
  3. [RR15459-01]
  4. [RR020141-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hypervitaminosis A is increasingly a public health concern, and thus noninvasive quantitative methods merit exploration. In this study, we applied the C-13-retinol isotope dilution test to a nonhuman primate model with excessive liver stores. After baseline serum chemistries, rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta; n = 16) were administered 3.5 mu mol C-13(2)-retinyl acetate. Blood was drawn at baseline, 5 h, and 2, 4, 7, 14, 21, and 28 d following the dose. Liver biopsies were collected 7 d before and 2 d after dosing (n = 4) and at 7, 14, and 28 d (n = 4/time) after dosing. Serum and liver were analyzed by HPLC and GC-combustion-isotope ratio MS for retinol and its enrichment, respectively. Model-based compartmental analysis was applied to serum data. Lactate dehydrogenase was elevated in 50% of the monkeys. Total body reserves (TBR) of vitamin A (VA) were calculated at 28 d. Predicted TBR (3.52 +/- 2.01 mmol VA) represented measured liver stores (4.56 +/- 1.38 mmol VA; P = 0.124). Predicted liver VA concentrations (13.3 +/- 9.7 mu mol/g) were similar to measured liver VA concentrations (16.4 +/- 5.3 mu mol/g). The kinetic models predict that 27-52% of extravascular VA is exchanging with serum in hypervitaminotic A monkeys. The test correctly diagnosed hypervitaminosis A in all monkeys, i.e. 100% sensitivity. Stable isotope techniques have important public health potential for the classification of VA status, including hypervitaminosis, because no other technique besides invasive liver biopsies, correctly identifies excessive liver VA stores. J. Nutr. 139: 2000-2006, 2009.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available