4.6 Article

Energy restriction and exercise differentially enhance components of systemic and mucosal immunity in mice

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 138, Issue 1, Pages 115-122

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jn/138.1.115

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [Z01BC010969, ZIABC010967, Z01BC010944, Z01BC010598, Z01BC010970] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [P30ES007784] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. Intramural NIH HHS [Z01 BC010598-04] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIEHS NIH HHS [P30 ES007784] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The prevalence of obesity, an established risk factor for several chronic diseases, including cancer, has risen dramatically over the past 4 decades. Dietary change and/or increased physical activity are the most commonly recommended lifestyle-based strategies for preventing or reversing obesity. One of several physiological systems that may be enhanced by dietary change and exercise is the immune system. In this study, we examined the effects of energy restriction (ER; 30% reduction relative to control energy intake) and/or exercise (EX; voluntary wheel running) on systemic and mucosal immune function. Female C57BL/6 mice were randomized into 4 treatment conditions: 1) controls consumed ad libitum (AL); 2) AL with access to running wheels (AL + EX); 3) 30% ER; and 4) 30% ER with access to running wheels (ER + EX). Both ER and EX reduced spleen weight and the number of splenic T and B lymphocytes (P < 0.05). ER enhanced natural killer (NK) cell function, but reduced concanavalin A (Con A)-induced T-cell proliferation (P < 0.05). In contrast, EX enhanced Con A-induced proliferation and cytokine production from Peyer's patch cells (P < 0.05). These data suggest that ER and EX enhance some, but not all, components of the immune system and are likely working via different biological mechanisms to regulate NK and T-cell function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available