4.2 Article

Nurse Outcomes in Magnet® and Non-Magnet Hospitals

Journal

JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION
Volume 41, Issue 10, Pages 428-433

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e31822eddbc

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Margretta M. Styles Scholar/American Nurse Foundation
  2. National Institute for Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health [T32-NR-007104, R01NR04513]
  3. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [K08-HS017551]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The important goals of Magnet (R) hospitals are to create supportive professional nursing care environments. A recently published paper found little difference in work environments between Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals. The aim of this study was to determine whether work environments, staffing, and nurse outcomes differ between Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals. A secondary analysis of data from a 4-state survey of 26,276 nurses in 567 acute care hospitals to evaluate differences in work environments and nurse outcomes in Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals was conducted. Magnet hospitals had significantly better work environments (t = -5.29, P < .001) and more highly educated nurses (t = -2.27, P < .001). Magnet hospital nurses were 18% less likely to be dissatisfied with their job (P < .05) and 13% less likely to report high burnout (P < .05). Magnet hospitals have significantly better work environments than non-Magnet hospitals. The better work environments of Magnet hospitals are associated with lower levels of nurse job dissatisfaction and burnout.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available