4.6 Article

Influence of halide precursor type and its composition on the electronic properties of vacuum deposited perovskite films

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 17, Issue 37, Pages 24342-24348

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5cp04207k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) [2014-007296]
  2. New & Renewable Energy of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) - Korea government MKE [20123010010150]
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20123010010150] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2014R1A2A2A01007296] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We fabricate mixed halide perovskite films through dual-source vacuum deposition of PbX2 (X = Cl, Br, and I) and methyl ammonium iodide (MAI) precursors with various deposition ratios. Vacuum deposition is an optimal way for film fabrication because it gives a uniform perovskite film which is free from contamination such as metallic phase lead, residual solvent, and moisture. The ionization potential and bandgap of MAPb(I1-yBry)(3) film are controlled by changing the halide composition and lattice constant. In contrast, MAPb(I1-yCly)(3) film shows negligible difference from MAPbI(3) in terms of structural and electronic properties, which is due to poor Cl incorporation in the film from the MACl removal during crystal formation. An excess supply of MAI is necessary to form a perovskite crystal structure. Based on the elemental stoichiometry analysis, the additional methyl ammonium cation with respect to Pb in the film plays a critical role in changing the electron affinity and energy level alignment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available