Journal
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Volume 51, Issue 9, Pages 1368-1376Publisher
SOC NUCLEAR MEDICINE INC
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.110.078501
Keywords
oncology; PET; other; delineation; F-18-FDG; F-18-FLT; reproducibility; tumor volume
Funding
- Ligue Contre le Cancer (Finistere Committee)
- French National Research Agency [ANR-08-ETEC-005-01]
- Canceropole Grand Ouest [R05014NG]
- CR-UK & EPSRC Cancer Imaging Centre (Imperial College, London)
- U.K. Medical Research Council
- Department of Health [C2536/A10337, U.1200.02.005.00001.01]
- MRC [MC_U120081322, MC_U120085814] Funding Source: UKRI
- Cancer Research UK [10337] Funding Source: researchfish
- Medical Research Council [MC_U120085814, MC_U120081322] Funding Source: researchfish
- National Institute for Health Research [NIHR/CS/009/009] Funding Source: researchfish
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The objective of this study was to establish the repeatability and reproducibility limits of several volume-related PET image-derived indices-namely tumor volume (TV), mean standardized uptake value, total glycolytic volume (TGV), and total proliferative volume (TPV)-relative to those of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), commonly used in clinical practice. Methods: Fixed and adaptive thresholding, fuzzy C-means, and fuzzy locally adaptive Bayesian methodology were considered for TV delineation. Double-baseline F-18-FDG (17 lesions, 14 esophageal cancer patients) and 3'-deoxy-3'-F-18-fluorothymidine (F-18-FLT) (12 lesions, 9 breast cancer patients) PET scans, acquired at a mean interval of 4 d and before any treatment, were used for reproducibility evaluation. The repeatability of each method was evaluated for the same datasets and compared with manual delineation. Results: A negligible variability of less than 5% was measured for all segmentation approaches in comparison to manual delineation (5%-35%). SUVmax reproducibility levels were similar to others previously reported, with a mean percentage difference of 1.8% +/- 16.7% and -0.9% +/- 14.9% for the F-18-FDG and F-18-FLT lesions, respectively. The best TV, TGV, and TPV reproducibility limits ranged from -21% to 31% and -30% to 37% for F-18-FDG and F-18-FLT images, respectively, whereas the worst reproducibility limits ranged from -90% to 73% and -68% to 52%, respectively. Conclusion: The reproducibility of estimating TV, mean standardized uptake value, and derived TGV and TPV was found to vary among segmentation algorithms. Some differences between F-18-FDG and F-18-FLT scans were observed, mainly because of differences in overall image quality. The smaller reproducibility limits for volume-derived image indices were similar to those for SUVmax, suggesting that the use of appropriate delineation tools should allow the determination of tumor functional volumes in PET images in a repeatable and reproducible fashion.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available