4.7 Article

Improvement of Early 18F-FDG PET Interpretation in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Importance of the Reference Background

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Volume 51, Issue 12, Pages 1857-1862

Publisher

SOC NUCLEAR MEDICINE INC
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.110.080556

Keywords

PET; lymphoma; prognosis; response

Funding

  1. Delegation a la Recherche Clinique de l'Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris [PHRC-AOM00152]
  2. Societe Francaise de Radiologie (SFR)
  3. Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (ARC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated whether the reference background above which a residual mass is considered positive in the International Harmonization Project criteria should be modified for early F-18-FDG PET evaluation. Methods: In 92 patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, the maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was measured on post-cycle 2 PET in the most intense residual mass (or, in the case of negative PET findings, in the area of most intense tumor uptake before therapy), in the mediastinal blood pool (MBP) and the liver, as potential reference background tissues. Results: With MBP as a reference (SUVmax, 2.0 +/- 0.6), PET was unable to distinguish early responders from nonresponders. In contrast, with liver as a reference (SUVmax, 2.5 +/- 0.7), 2-y progressionfree survival was significantly different between patients with PET-negative findings (81.8% [95% confidence interval, 71%-93%]) and patients with PET-positive findings (51.8% [95% confidence interval, 35%-69%], P = 0.003). Conclusion: When assessing early response, particularly in risk-adapted therapeutic trials, it seems preferable to refer to a background tissue (liver) with a higher level of uptake than that of current international criteria (MBP) which were designed for end-of-treatment evaluation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available