4.7 Article

Small-Animal PET of Tumors with 64Cu-Labeled RGD-Bombesin Heterodimer

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Volume 50, Issue 7, Pages 1168-1177

Publisher

SOC NUCLEAR MEDICINE INC
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.061739

Keywords

RGD-BBN heterodimer; bombesin; positron emission tomography (PET); gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR); integrin alpha(v)beta(3); Cu-64

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [NCI R01 120188, R01 CA119053, R21 CA121842, R21 CA102123, P50 CA114747, U54 CA119367, R24 CA93862]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The overexpression of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) in various tumor types suggests that GRPR is an attractive target for cancer imaging and therapy with radiolabeled bombesin analogs. We recently reported the ability of F-18-labeled RGD-bombesin heterodimer to be used for dual integrin alpha(v)beta(3)- and GRPR-targeted imaging. To further investigate the synergistic effect of the dual-receptor targeting of peptide heterodimers, we evaluated Cu-64-labeled RGD-bombesin for PET imaging of tumors. Methods: RGD-bombesin was coupled with 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N, N ', N '', N '''-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) and 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid (NOTA), and the conjugates were labeled with Cu-64. The in vitro and in vivo characteristics of Cu-64-NOTA-RGD-bombesin were compared with those of Cu-64-NOTA-RGD, Cu-64-NOTA-bombesin, and Cu-64-DOTA-RGD-bombesin. Results: Cu-64-NOTA-RGD-bombesin and Cu-64-DOTA-RGD-bombesin had comparable dual integrin alpha(v)beta(3)- and GRPR-binding affinities in vitro, both of which were slightly lower than RGD for integrin binding and bombesin for GRPR binding. Cu-64-NOTA-RGD-bombesin possessed significantly higher tumor uptake than did Cu-64-NOTA-RGD, Cu-64-NOTA-bombesin, the mixture of Cu-64-NOTA-RGD and Cu-64-NOTA-bombesin, or Cu-64-DOTA-RGD-bombesin in PC-3 prostate cancer. Cu-64-NOTA-RGD-bombesin also showed improved in vivo kinetics such as lower liver and intestinal activity accumulation than did the bombesin tracers. Cu-64-NOTA-RGD-bombesin also outperformed Cu-64-NOTA-RGD in a 4T1 murine mammary carcinoma model that expresses integrin on tumor vasculature but no GRPR in tumor tissue, which had no uptake of Cu-64-NOTA-bombesin. Conclusion: Compared with other tracers, Cu-64-NOTA-RGD-bombesin showed favorable in vivo kinetics and enhanced tumor uptake, which warrants its further investigation for targeting tumors that express integrin or GRPR or that coexpress integrin and GRPR for imaging and therapeutic applications. The synergistic effect of RGD-bombesin heterodimers observed in this study also encourages further investigations of novel heterodimers recognizing other cell surface receptors for tumor targeting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available