4.7 Article

A New 18F-Labeled Myocardial PET Tracer: Myocardial Uptake After Permanent and Transient Coronary Occlusion in Rats

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Volume 49, Issue 10, Pages 1715-1722

Publisher

SOC NUCLEAR MEDICINE INC
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.053967

Keywords

cardiology (clinical); PET; animal imaging; F-18; infarction; ischemia; perfusion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conventional myocardial perfusion PET tracers require onsite tracer production because of their short radioactive half-lives. To investigate the potential of a new F-18-labeled pyridazinone analog (F-18-BMS-747158-02), we characterized this tracer in a rat model of permanent and transient coronary occlusion using small-animal PET. Methods: Myocardial 18F-BMS-747158-02 distribution in healthy rats (n = 7), rats with transient (3-min) left coronary artery occlusion (n = 11), and rats with permanent left coronary occlusion (n = 11) was analyzed with a dedicated small-animal PET scanner. Results: Normal hearts demonstrated intense and almost homogeneous tracer uptake throughout the left ventricle for more than 2 h. During permanent coronary occlusion, PET demonstrated perfusion defects, which remained unchanged (37.6% +/- 8.8%, 37.4% +/- 10.2%, and 36.2% +/- 9.8% left ventricle at 15, 45, and 115 min, respectively, after tracer injection). After transient ischemia, the induced defect size decreased significantly after reperfusion (16.2% +/- 9.3%, 6.0% +/- 6.5%, and 1.4% +/- 1.3% left ventricle). Tracer reinjection after transient ischemia resulted in normalization of the induced defect. Conclusion: Coronary occlusion yielded distinct myocardial 18F-BMS-747158-02 uptake defects in the area of ischemia, which demonstrated normalization of activity after reperfusion and reinjection. These promising kinetic parameters may allow for assessment of flow using exercise-rest protocols similar to those used in combination with exercise and rest perfusion SPECT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available