4.7 Article

Radiation tolerance of commercial and advanced alloys for core internals: a comprehensive microstructural characterization

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS
Volume 510, Issue -, Pages 396-413

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.08.035

Keywords

Radiation damage; Structure material; Microstructure; Nickel-base alloy; Precipitate

Funding

  1. EPRI [10002164, 10002154]
  2. DOE [4000136101]
  3. DOE NE under DOE Idaho Operations Office, Nuclear Science User Facilities experiment [DE-AC07-051D14517]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thirteen austenitic stainless steels, nickel-base alloys, and ferritic alloys were irradiated using 2 MeV protons at 360 degrees C to a damage level of 2.5 displacements per atom (dpa). Comprehensive microstructural characterization was performed for irradiation-induced features, including dislocation loops, voids, precipitates, and radiation induced segregation (RIS). Dislocation loops formed in all alloys except 14YWT, while voids were observed in alloys 316 L, 310, C22, and 14YWT. Irradiation-induced formation of gamma' precipitates was observed in alloys 316 L, 310, 800, and 690; the irradiation-enhanced, long-range ordered Ni2Cr phase (Pt2Mo-type) was observed in alloys 690, C22, 625, 625Plus, 625DA, and 725; and G-phase was observed in alloy T92. No irradiation-induced precipitates were observed in alloys X750, 718 or 14YWT. Precipitation of the gamma' phase can be understood through segregation and clustering of Si, Al, and Ti. Overall, austenitic stainless steels are generally susceptible to irradiation damage in the form of loops, voids, precipitates, and RIS. Ni-base alloys have this same type of dislocation loops and RIS behaviors but are more resistant to void swelling. Ferritic alloys showed better resistance to loop formation, void swelling and irradiation-induced precipitation. From the degree of irradiation-induced microstructural change, alloy T92 was identified as the most radiation resistant among these alloys. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available