4.6 Article

Electron transfer kinetics on natural crystals of MoS2 and graphite

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 17, Issue 27, Pages 17844-17853

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5cp02490k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/I005145/1, EP/K016954/1]
  2. BGT Materials
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I005145/1, EP/K016954/1, 1104658] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Here, we evaluate the electrochemical performance of sparsely studied natural crystals of molybdenite and graphite, which have increasingly been used for fabrication of next generation monolayer molybdenum disulphide and graphene energy storage devices. Heterogeneous electron transfer kinetics of several redox mediators, including Fe(CN)(6)(3-/4-), Ru(NH3)(6)(3+/2+) and IrCl62-/3- are determined using voltammetry in a micro-droplet cell. The kinetics on both materials are studied as a function of surface defectiveness, surface ageing, applied potential and illumination. We find that the basal planes of both natural MoS2 and graphite show significant electroactivity, but a large decrease in electron transfer kinetics is observed on atmosphere-aged surfaces in comparison to in situ freshly cleaved surfaces of both materials. This is attributed to surface oxidation and adsorption of airborne contaminants at the surface exposed to an ambient environment. In contrast to semimetallic graphite, the electrode kinetics on semiconducting MoS2 are strongly dependent on the surface illumination and applied potential. Furthermore, while visibly present defects/cracks do not significantly affect the response of graphite, the kinetics on MoS2 systematically accelerate with small increase in disorder. These findings have direct implications for use of MoS2 and graphene/graphite as electrode materials in electrochemistry-related applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available