4.6 Article

Extensions and applications of the A24 data set of accurate interaction energies

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 17, Issue 29, Pages 19268-19277

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5cp03151f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Czech Science Foundation [P208/12/G016]
  2. operational program Research and Development for Innovations of the European Social Fund [CZ 1.05/2.1.00/03/0058]
  3. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [LO1305]
  4. Research Project of the Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic [RVO: 61388963]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The A24 data set (Rezac. and Hobza, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013, 9, 2151-2155) is a set of non-covalent complexes large enough to showcase various types of interactions yet small enough to make highly accurate calculations possible. It is intended for the testing of accurate computational methods which are then used as a benchmark in larger model systems. In this work, we improve the best estimate of the interaction energies in the set by updating their CCSD(T)/CBS and CCSDT(Q) components with calculations in larger basis sets. The data set is then used to test a large number of composite CCSD(T) approaches. Special attention is paid to the use of the explicitly correlated MP2-F12 method in these composite calculations. It is shown that an accuracy of 1-2% can be achieved with setups applicable to larger molecules. The effect of frozen natural orbital approximation on the accuracy of composite CCSD(T)/CBS calculations is also quantified. In four trivially saturated complexes where CCSDT(Q)/CBS data are now available, the convergence of the many-body correlation effects is assessed by fixed-node diffusion Monte Carlo (FN-DMC) calculations. A good agreement is achieved between FN-DMC and high-level coupled-cluster which represents an important cross-check of both approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available