4.4 Article

Slip effects in HDPE flows

Journal

JOURNAL OF NON-NEWTONIAN FLUID MECHANICS
Volume 167, Issue -, Pages 18-29

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2011.09.007

Keywords

Non-isothermal die flow; HDPE melt; K-BKZ constitutive equation; Viscoelasticity; Slip effects; Entrance pressure drop

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
  2. NTUA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The capillary flow of a high-density polyethylene (HDPE) melt was studied both experimentally and numerically. The excess pressure drop due to entry (entrance pressure drop), the compressibility, the effect of pressure and temperature on viscosity, and the slip effects on the capillary data analysis have been examined. Using a series of capillary dies having different diameters, D, and length-to-diameter LID ratios, a full theological characterization has been carried out, and the experimental data have been fitted both with a viscous model (Cross) and a viscoelastic one (the Kaye-Bernstein, Kearsley, Zapas/Papanastasiou, Scriven, Macosko or K-BKZ/PSM model). Particular emphasis has been placed on the effects of wall slip (significant for HDPE). For the viscous model, the viscosity is a function of both temperature and pressure. For the viscoelastic K-BKZ model, the time-temperature shifting concept has been used for the non-isothermal calculations, while the time-pressure shifting concept has been used to shift the relaxation moduli for the pressure-dependence effect. It was found that only the viscoelastic simulations were capable of reproducing the experimental data well. On the other hand, viscous modeling underestimates the pressures drops, especially at the higher apparent shear rates and L/D ratios. It is concluded that wall slip effects are significant for HDPE flow, whereas viscous heating is not. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available