4.4 Article

Prediction of normal stresses under large amplitude oscillatory shear flow

Journal

JOURNAL OF NON-NEWTONIAN FLUID MECHANICS
Volume 150, Issue 1, Pages 1-10

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2007.10.002

Keywords

LAOS; normal stress differences; Giesekus model; Fourier transform rheology

Categories

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2003-01367] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The dynamic response of viscoelastic fluids under large amplitude oscillatory shear (LAOS) has been a subject of long history. In the LAOS flow, the analysis has been mostly focused on shear stress, possibly due to the lack of accurate measurement of normal stress. However, the normal stress may become larger,than shear stress at high-strain amplitudes, and thus it is important that we have a good understanding of the normal stress behavior. Furthermore, with the advancement in the instrumentation, it has become possible to get more reliable data. ne purpose of this paper is to develop a research platform to analyze and to understand the normal stress behavior of complex fluids under LAOS flow. In this study, we utilized the Giesekus model as a representative constitutive model, and investigated its diverse responses. We defined the dynamic properties corresponding to normal stress, in a similar way to define dynamic moduli from shear stress, and examine their behavior with various analyzing tools. Experimental data were also compared with model predictions. Despite the fact that it is not yet possible to compare all of the predictions because of instrumental limitation, the prediction has been found to fit well with the experimental data. This study is expected to provide a useful framework for further understanding the nonlinear behavior of complex fluids at large deformation. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available