4.7 Article

Isothermal and non-isothermal crystallization of a fresnoite glass

Journal

JOURNAL OF NON-CRYSTALLINE SOLIDS
Volume 362, Issue -, Pages 114-119

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.11.026

Keywords

Fresnoite glass; Isothermal crystallization; Non-isothermal crystallization

Funding

  1. CNPq [2008/620189, 557776/2008-2]
  2. CAPES [2008/2365]
  3. FAPEMA [2012/002717]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several analytical models have been widely applied to determine the activation energy of crystallization, E, and the Avrami index, n. In this work, the parameters E and n for the crystallization of fresnoite (2BaO center dot TiO2 center dot 2SiO(2)) glass were calculated using different approaches (Ozawa, Kissinger, and Matusita & Sakka). Monolithic glass samples (approximate to 36 mg) were heated in a DSC furnace from room temperature to 650 degrees C at 40 degrees C/min, and held at that temperature for 5 mm. To induce the formation of new nuclei mostly in the nucleation zone, these samples were heat-treated in the temperature range of 650 degrees C to 750 degrees C at heating rates of 10 degrees C/min and 20 degrees C/min. They were then reheated at different heating rates (phi(c)=6, 8, 10, 15 and 20 degrees C/min) until they became completely crystallized. The experiments were carried out in a DSC furnace under an argon atmosphere (20 ml/min), using Pt crucibles. Additionally, to confirm the Avrami coefficient and the predominant crystallization mechanism, the evolution of the crystallized fraction over time was determined independently by powder X-ray diffraction of the fresnoite glass. In this case, the samples were heat-treated in a tubular furnace at 720 degrees C for different lengths of time. The Avrami index obtained by the non-isothermal DSC and XRD experiments are in excellent agreement and demonstrate that fresnoite crystallizes predominantly in the volume and occurs by simultaneous crystal nucleation and growth. The activation energy of crystallization predicted by Kissinger and Matusita & Sakka's models was E-C=(688 +/- 22) kJ/mol, and E-CK = (940 +/- 70) kJ/mol, respectively. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available