4.7 Article

Composition and polyamorphism in supercooled yttria-alumina melts

Journal

JOURNAL OF NON-CRYSTALLINE SOLIDS
Volume 357, Issue 2, Pages 435-441

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.06.072

Keywords

Diffraction and scattering measurements; Supercooled liquids; Glass formation; Phases and equilibria; Structure; Fluctuations; Critical phenomena

Funding

  1. Higher Education Funding Council in Wales through the Centre for Advanced Functional Materials and Devices

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By extending recent work on liquid-liquid transitions in supercooled yttria-alumina AYx liquids we draw attention to the compositional dependence of the structure factor of the high density liquid, arguing that this is sufficiently sensitive to discriminate between liquids at the level of a few %. Comparing structure factor differences between liquids of different compositions and in the same liquid AY20 between high and low temperatures straddling the transition at 1788 K between a high density liquid (HDL) and a low density liquid (LDL) enables compositional phase separation to be ruled out. It points instead to kinetic changes in polyhedral configurational order being the drivers for this polyamorphic transformation. Rotor behaviour observed in levitated liquid drops used in the high temperature experiments enables the reversibility of the LLT transition (LLT) and the associated changes in entropy and density to be identified. Evidence for critical-like behaviour in the structural relaxation time and in the fluctuation correlation length is presented. By re-examining recent work which failed to find the structural and thermal signatures for the LLT in liquid AY20 at 1788 K we present evidence for the LLT occurring instead in liquid AY15 at 1940 K, suggesting that the liquid-liquid transition temperature in AYx liquids decreases with increasing yttria content. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available