4.1 Article

Lack of immune responses against multiple sclerosis-associated retrovirus/human endogenous retrovirus W in patients with multiple sclerosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROVIROLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 143-151

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/13550280801958922

Keywords

antibodies; human endogenous retrovirus; multiple sclerosis; multiple sclerosis-associated retrovirus; T cells

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The multiple sclerosis-associated retrovirus (MSRV), originally identified in cell cultures from patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), is closely related to the human endogenous retrovirus family type W (HERV-W). Different lines of evidence appear compatible with a potential role of MSRV/HERV-W in the pathogenesis of MS. The authors therefore analyzed humoral and cellular immune responses against MSRV/HERV-W antigens in patients with MS, patients with other inflammatory and noninflammatory neurological diseases, and healthy controls, using indirect immunofluorescence and enzyme-linked immunospot assays. Antibodies against the HERV-W envelope (Env) protein, Syncytin-1, were found in one of 50 patients with MS and none of 59 controls, whereas antibodies against MSRV matrix and capsid (Gag) or Env proteins were not detectable in any of the patients or controls. Similarly, in a screening of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B7(+) patients with MS (n = 23) and controls (n = 29) for cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses against 36 predicted HLA-B7-restricted MSRV/HERV-W Gag-, protease-, and reverse transcriptase-derived peptides, no such responses could be detected in any of the subjects studied. These data suggest that there are no appreciable humoral or cellular immune responses against MSRV/HERV-W in patients with MS. While this may be due to immunological tolerance of physiologically expressed HERV-W proteins, strategies other than measurement of immune responses will be required to further elucidate the relationship between MSRV/HERV-W and MS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available