4.1 Article

Combination antiretroviral therapy modulates the blood oxygen level-dependent amplitude in human immunodeficiency virus-seropositive patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROVIROLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages 418-424

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/13550280802298112

Keywords

combination antiretroviral therapy (cART); functional magnetic resonance imaging; HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders

Funding

  1. Center for AIDS Research [AI045008]
  2. Center for Functional Neuroimaging [NS045839]
  3. University of Pennsylvania
  4. University of Pennsylvania AIDS Clinical Trials Unit [NIH AI 32783]
  5. Universitywide AIDS Research Program [CF05-SD-301]
  6. American Foundation of AIDS Research (amFAR) [106729-40-RFRL]
  7. Dana Foundation for Brain and Immuno-Imaging
  8. NIH [1K23MH081786]
  9. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [U01AI032783, P30AI045008] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  10. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [K23MH081786] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  11. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [P30NS045839] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) limits human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) replication in the central nervous system (CNS) and prevents progressive neurological dysfunction. We examined if the degree of CNS penetration by cART, as estimated by the CNS penetration effectiveness (CPE) score, affects brain activity as measured by the amplitude of the blood oxygen level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD fMRI) response. HIV+ patients on low-CPE cART (n=12) had a significantly greater BOLD fMRI response amplitude than HIV+ patients on high-CPE cART (n=12) or seronegative controls (n=10). An increase in the BOLD fMRI response in HIV patients on low-CPE cART may reflect continued HIV replication in the CNS leading to increased oxidative stress and associated metabolic demands.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available