4.5 Article

Non-Invasive Pressure Reactivity Index Using Doppler Systolic Flow Parameters: A Pilot Analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages 713-720

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2018.5987

Keywords

autoregulation; brain injury; TBI; TCD; time series

Funding

  1. Royal College of Surgeons of Canada - Harry S. Morton Travelling Fellowship in Surgery
  2. University of Manitoba Clinician Investigator Program
  3. National Institute for Healthcare Research (NIHR, UK) through the Acute Brain Injury and Repair theme of the Cambridge NIHR Biomedical Research Centre
  4. NIHR Senior Investigator Award
  5. European Union Framework Program 7 grant (CENTER-TBI) [602150]
  6. Cambridge Commonwealth Trust Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The goal was to predict pressure reactivity index (PRx) using non-invasive transcranial Doppler (TCD) based indices of cerebrovascular reactivity, systolic flow index (Sx_a), and mean flow index (Mx_a). Continuous extended duration time series recordings of middle cerebral artery cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) were obtained using robotic TCD in parallel with direct intracranial pressure (ICP). PRx, Sx_a, and Mx_a were derived from high frequency archived signals. Using time-series techniques, autoregressive integrative moving average (ARIMA) structure of PRx was determined and embedded in the following linear mixed effects (LME) models of PRx: PRx approximate to Sx_a and PRx approximate to Sx_a + Mx_a. Using 80% of the recorded patient data, the LME models were created and trained. Model superiority was assessed via Akaike information criterion (AIC), Bayesian information criterion (BIC), and log-likelihood (LL). The superior two models were then used to predict PRx using the remaining 20% of the signal data. Predicted and observed PRx were compared via Pearson correlation, linear models, and Bland-Altman (BA) analysis. Ten patients had 3-4h of continuous uninterrupted ICP and TCD data and were used for this pilot analysis. Optimal ARIMA structure for PRx was determined to be (2,0,2), and this was embedded in all LME models. The top two LME models of PRx were determined to be: PRx approximate to Sx_a and PRx approximate to Sx_a + Mx_a. Estimated and observed PRx values from both models were strongly correlated (r>0.9; p<0.0001 for both), with acceptable agreement on BA analysis. Predicted PRx using these two models was also moderately correlated with observed PRx, with acceptable agreement (r=0.797, p=0.006; r=0.763, p=0.011; respectively). With application of ARIMA and LME modeling, it is possible to predict PRx using non-invasive TCD measures. These are the first and as well as being preliminary attempts at doing so. Much further work is required.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available