4.5 Article

Multivariate Outcome Prediction in Traumatic Brain Injury with Focus on Laboratory Values

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA
Volume 29, Issue 17, Pages 2613-2624

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2012.2468

Keywords

Glasgow Coma Score; Glasgow Outcome Scale; hematologic tests; outcome; traumatic brain injury (TBI)

Funding

  1. Regional Agreement on Medical Training and Clinical Research (ALF)
  2. Stockholm County Council
  3. Karolinska Institutet
  4. Swedish Research Council
  5. Swedish Cancer and Traffic Injury Fund (CTRF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Identifying factors relevant to outcome can provide a better understanding of TBI pathophysiology, in addition to aiding prognostication. Many common laboratory variables have been related to outcome but may not be independent predictors in a multivariate setting. In this study, 757 patients were identified in the Karolinska TBI database who had retrievable early laboratory variables. These were analyzed towards a dichotomized Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) with logistic regression and relevance vector machines, a non-linear machine learning method, univariately and controlled for the known important predictors in TBI outcome: age, Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), pupil response, and computed tomography (CT) score. Accuracy was assessed with Nagelkerke's pseudo R-2. Of the 18 investigated laboratory variables, 15 were found significant (p < 0.05) towards outcome in univariate analyses. In contrast, when adjusting for other predictors, few remained significant. Creatinine was found an independent predictor of TBI outcome. Glucose, albumin, and osmolarity levels were also identified as predictors, depending on analysis method. A worse outcome related to increasing osmolarity may warrant further study. Importantly, hemoglobin was not found significant when adjusted for post-resuscitation GCS as opposed to an admission GCS, and timing of GCS can thus have a major impact on conclusions. In total, laboratory variables added an additional 1.3-4.4% to pseudo R-2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available