4.5 Article

Fibronectin Inhibits Chronic Pain Development after Spinal Cord Injury

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages 589-599

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2011.2059

Keywords

fibronectin; inflammation; mechanical allodynia; serotonin; thermal hyperalgesia

Funding

  1. Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  2. National Institutes of Health/National Institute for Neurological Diseases and Stroke (NIH/NINDS) [NS069765, NS25713]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic pain following spinal cord injury (SCI) is a highly prevalent clinical condition that is difficult to treat. Using both von Frey filaments and radiant infrared heat to assess mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia, respectively, we have demonstrated that a one-time injection of fibronectin (50 mu g/mL) into the spinal dorsal column (1 mu L/min each injection for a total of 5 mu L) immediately after SCI inhibits the development of mechanical allodynia (but not thermal hyperalgesia) over an 8-month observation period following spinal cord dorsal column crush (DCC). DCC will only induce mechanical Allodynia, but not thermal hyperalgesia or overt motor deficits. By applying various fibronectin fragments as well as competitive inhibitors, these effects were shown to be dependent on the connecting segment-1 (CS-1) motif of fibronectin. Furthermore, we found that acute fibronectin treatment diminished inflammation and blood-spinal cord barrier permeability, which in turn leads to enhanced fiber sparing and sprouting. In particular, the reduction of serotonin (5-HT) in the superficial dorsal horn, an important descending brainstem system in the modulation of pain, was blocked with fibronectin treatment. We conclude that treatment of SCI with fibronectin preserves sensory regulation and prevents the development of chronic allodynia, providing a potential therapeutic intervention to treat chronic pain following SCI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available