4.5 Article

Neuropathological Findings in Disabled Survivors of a Head Injury

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages 701-709

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT INC
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2010.1733

Keywords

assessment by Glasgow Outcome Scale; neuropathology; permanent disability; head injury; traumatic brain injury

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated how the occurrence and severity of the main neuropathological types of traumatic brain injury (TBI) influenced the severity of disability after a head injury. Eighty-five victims, each of whom had lived at least a month after a head injury but then died, were studied. Judged by the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), before death 35 were vegetative, 30 were severely and 20 were moderately disabled. Neuropathological assessment showed that 71 (84%) victims had sustained cerebral contusions, 49 (58%) had diffuse axonal injury (DAI), 57 (67%), had ischemic brain damage (IBD), 58 (68%) had symmetrical ventricular enlargement, and in 47 (55%) intracranial pressure (ICP) had been increased. Thirty-five (41%) had undergone evacuation of an intracranial hematoma. Brainstem damage was seen in only 11 (13%). Analysis (chi(2) test for trends) of the relationship between these features and outcome showed that findings of DAI, raised ICP, thalamic damage, or ventricular enlargement (all p < 0.005), and IBD (p = 0.04) were associated with an increasingly worse outcome. Conversely, moderate or severe contusions (p = 0.001) were increasingly associated with better outcomes, and evacuation of a hematoma was associated (p = 0.001) with outcomes likely to be better than vegetative. We conclude that diffuse or multifocal neuropathological patterns of TBI from primary axonal injury or secondary ischemic damage are most likely to be associated with the most severely impaired outcomes after a head injury.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available