4.5 Article

Reactive Astrocytes Inhibit the Survival and Differentiation of Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cells by Secreted TNF-α

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages 1089-1100

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2010.1597

Keywords

differentiation; glial scar; oligodendrocyte precursor cell; survival; tumor necrosis factor-alpha; reactive astrocyte; spinal cord injury

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [30700209, 31070922]
  2. National Key Basic Research Program [2011CB504401, 2007CB947100]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2009ZX09311-001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Axonal demyelination is a consistent pathological characteristic of spinal cord injury (SCI). Although an increased number of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs) is observed in the injured spinal cord, they fail to convert into mature oligodendrocytes. However, little is known about the underlying mechanism. In our study, we identified a link between inhibition of OPC survival and differentiation and reactive astrocytes in glial scar that was mediated by tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). Initially, both glial scar tissue and reactive astrocyte-conditioned medium were shown to inhibit OPC differentiation. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and immunochemistry revealed that OPCs expressed type 1 TNF-alpha receptor (TNF-R1). When TNF-alpha or TNF-R1 was neutralized with antibody, the effect of reactive astrocyte-conditioned medium or recombinant TNF-alpha protein on OPC differentiation was markedly attenuated. In addition, reactive astrocyte-conditioned medium was also shown to induce OPC apoptosis. All these findings provide the first evidence that reactive astrocytes release TNF-alpha to inhibit OPC survival and prevent them from differentiating into mature oligodendrocytes, suggesting a mechanism for the failure of remyelination after SCI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available