4.5 Article

Axon Regeneration through Scaffold into Distal Spinal Cord after Transection

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA
Volume 26, Issue 10, Pages 1759-1771

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2008.0610

Keywords

axonal tracing; biodegradable polymers; Fast Blue; Schwann cells; spinal cord injury

Funding

  1. NIH [EB002390]
  2. Wilson, Morton and Mayo Foundations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We employed Fast Blue (FB) axonal tracing to determine the origin of regenerating axons after thoracic spinal cord transection injury in rats. Schwann cell (SC)-loaded, biodegradable, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) scaffolds were implanted after transection. Scaffolds loaded with solubilized basement membrane preparation (without SCs) were used for negative controls, and nontransected cords were positive controls. One or 2 months after injury and scaffold implantation, FB was injected 0-15 mm caudal or about 5 mm rostral to the scaffold. One week later, tissue was harvested and the scaffold and cord sectioned longitudinally (30 mu m) on a cryostat. Trans-scaffold labeling of neuron cell bodies was identified with confocal microscopy in all cell-transplanted groups. Large (30-50 mu m diameter) neuron cell bodies were predominantly labeled in the ventral horn region. Most labeled neurons were seen 1-10 mm rostral to the scaffold, although some neurons were also labeled in the cervical cord. Axonal growth occurred bidirectionally after cord transection, and axons regenerated up to 14 mm beyond the PLGA scaffolds and into distal cord. The extent of FB labeling was negatively correlated with distance from the injection site to the scaffold. Electron microscopy showed myelinated axons in the transverse sections of the implanted scaffold 2 months after implantation. The pattern of myelination, with extracellular collagen and basal lamina, was characteristic of SC myelination. Our results show that FB labeling is an effective way to measure the origin of regenerating axons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available