4.5 Article

Genetic Ablation of Transcription Repressor Bach1 Reduces Neural Tissue Damage and Improves Locomotor Function after Spinal Cord Injury in Mice

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 31-39

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2008.0667

Keywords

Bach1; heme oxygenase-1; knock-out mice; oxidative stress; spinal cord injury

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [19591712]
  2. Japan Orthopaedics and Traumatology Foundation, Inc. [0138]
  3. The General Insurance Association of Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heme oxygenase (HO)-1 is an inducible cytoprotective enzyme that degrades heme to iron, carbon monoxide (CO), and biliverdin, the latter two of which are thought to mediate the anti-inflammatory and antioxidant actions of HO-1. Bach1 is a transcriptional repressor of the HO-1 gene (Hmox-1). Previous reports have demonstrated that the genetic ablation of Bach1 engenders an increased HO-1 expression and a marked reduction in the degree of oxidative tissue damage in vivo. However, the function of Bach1 in spinal cord injury is still not understood. In the present study, we examined whether Bach1 deficiency increases HO-1 expression and reduces neural tissue damage in a spinal cord injury model using Bach1 knock-out (KO) mice and wild-type (WT) mice. The expression of HO-1 protein in the spinal cord was significantly higher in the Bach1 KO mice than in the WT mice before and after injury. The KO mice also had significantly higher Basso mouse scale scores for locomotor function and larger areas of spared white matter than the WT mice at 6 weeks after injury. Neuronal loss and apoptotic cell death in the injured spinal cord was significantly reduced in the KO mice in comparison to the WT mice. These results suggest that Bach1 deficiency engenders a constitutively higher expression of HO-1 and a dramatic increase in cytoprotection against spinal cord injury.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available