4.6 Article

Long-term ongoing cortical remodeling after contralateral C-7 nerve transfer

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
Volume 118, Issue 4, Pages 725-729

Publisher

AMER ASSOC NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS
DOI: 10.3171/2012.12.JNS12207

Keywords

contralateral C-7 nerve transfer; long-term cortical remodeling; brachial plexus avulsion injury; functional neurosurgery; peripheral nerve

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81171151, 30772188, 30800344, 30872408]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Object. Contralateral C-7 nerve transfer was developed for the treatment of patients with brachial plexus avulsion injury (BPAI). In the surgical procedure the affected recipient nerve is connected to the ipsilateral motor cortex, and the dramatic peripheral alteration may trigger extensive cortical reorganization. However, little is known about the long-term results after such specific nerve transfers. The purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term cortical adaptive plasticity after BPAI and contralateral C-7 nerve transfer. Methods. In this study, 9 healthy male volunteers and 5 male patients who suffered from right-sided BPAI and had undergone contralateral C-7-transfer more than 5 years earlier were included. Functional MRI studies were used for the investigation of long-term cerebral plasticity. Results. The neuroimaging results suggested that the ongoing cortical remodeling process after contralateral C-7 nerve transfer could last for a long period; at least for 5 years. The motor control of the reinnervated limb may finally transfer from the ipsilateral to the contralateral hemisphere exclusively, instead of the bilateral neural network activation. Conclusions. The authors believe that the cortical remodeling may last for a long period after peripheral rearrangement and that the successful cortical transfer is the foundation of the independent motor recovery. (http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2012.12.JNS12207)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available