4.6 Article

Venous sacrifice in neurosurgery: new insights from venous indocyanine green videoangiography

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
Volume 115, Issue 1, Pages 18-23

Publisher

AMER ASSOC NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS
DOI: 10.3171/2011.3.JNS10620

Keywords

cerebral veins; cerebrovascular neurosurgery; indocyanine green angiography; surgical technique

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Object. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate whether venous indocyanine green (ICG) videoangiography has any potential for predicting the presence of a safe collateral circulation for veins that are at risk for intentional or unintentional damage during surgery. Methods. The authors performed venous ICG videoangiography during 153 consecutive neurosurgical procedures. On those occasions in which a venous sacrifice occurred during surgery, whether that sacrifice was preplanned (intended) or unintended, venous ICG videoangiography was repeated so as to allow us to study the effect of venous sacrifice. A specific test to predict the presence of venous collateral circulation was also applied in 8 of these cases. Results. Venous ICG videoangiography allowed for an intraoperative real-time flow assessment of the exposed veins with excellent image quality and resolution in all cases. The veins observed in this study were found to be extremely different with respect to flow dynamics and could be divided in 3 groups: 1) arterialized veins; 2) fast-draining veins with uniform filling and clear flow direction; and 3) slow-draining veins with nonuniform filling. Temporary clipping was found to be a simple and reversible way to test for the presence of potential anastomotic circulation. Conclusions. Venous ICG videoangiography is able to reveal substantial variability in the venous flow dynamics. Slow veins, when they are tributaries of bridging veins, might hide a potential for anastomotic circulation that deserve further investigation. (DOI: 10.3171/2011.3.JNS10620)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available