4.6 Article

Insular gliomals: the case for surgical management Clinical article

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
Volume 110, Issue 4, Pages 685-695

Publisher

AMER ASSOC NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS
DOI: 10.3171/2008.7.JNS17639

Keywords

functional outcome; insular glioma; microsurgery; prognostic factor; survival

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Object. Treatment for insular (paralimbic) gliomas is controversial. In this report the authors summarize their experience with microsurgical resection of insular tumors. Methods. The authors analyzed complications, functional Outcomes, and survival in a series of 101 operations performed in 94 patients between 1995 and 2005. Results. A > 90% resection was achieved in 42%, and 70-90% tumor removal was accomplished in 51% of cases. Functional outcornes varied considerably between patient subgroups.For example, in neurologically intact patients <= 40 years of age with WHO Grade I-III tumors, good outcomes (Karnofsky Performance Scale Score 80-100) were seen in 91% of cases. Predictors of an unfavourable functional outcome included histological features of glioblastoma, advantage age, and a low preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale score. One year after surgery, 76% of patients who had presented with epilepsy were seizure free or experienced only isolated. nondebilitating seizures. Surprisingly good survival rates were seen after surgery for anaplastic gliomas. The median survival for patients with anaplastic astrocytomas (WHO Grade III) was 5 years, and the 5-year survival rate for those with anaplastic oligodendroglial tumors was 80%. Independent predictors of survival included younger age. favorable histological features (WHO Grade 1 and oligodendroglial tumors), Yasargil Type 5A/B tumors with frontal extensions, and more extensive resections. Conclusions. insular tumor surgery carries substantial complication rates. However, suprisingly similar figures have been reported in large unselected craniotomy series and also-after alternative treatment regimens. In view of the oncological benefits of resective surgery, our data Would therefore argue for microsurgery as the primary treatment for most patients with a presumed WHO Grade I-III tumor. Patients with glioblastomas and/or age > 60 years require a more cautious approach. (DOI: 10.3171/2008.7.JNS17639)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available