4.6 Article

Antiangiogenic therapy using bevacizumab in recurrent high-grade glioma: impact on local control and patient survival

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
Volume 110, Issue 1, Pages 173-180

Publisher

AMER ASSOC NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS
DOI: 10.3171/2008.4.17492

Keywords

antiangiogenic therapy; bevacizumab; high-grade glioma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Object. Antiangiogenic agents have recently shown impressive radiological responses in high-grade glioma. However, it is not clear if the responses are related to vascular changes or due to antitumoral effects. The authors report the mature results of a clinical study of bevacizumab-based treatment of recurrent high-grade gliomas. Methods. Sixty-one patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas received treatment with bevacizumab at 10 mg/ kg every 2 weeks for 4 doses in an 8-week cycle along with either irinotecan or carboplatin. The choice of concomitant chemotherapeutic agent was based on the number of recurrences and prior chemotherapy. Results. At a median follow-up of 7.5 months (range 1-19 months), 50 (82%) of 61 patients relapsed and 42 patients (70%) died of the disease. The median number of administered bevacizumab cycles was 2 (range 1-7 cycles). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.3-7.7) and 9 (95% CI 7.6-10.4) months, respectively, as calculated from the initiation of the bevacizumab-based therapy. Radiologically demonstrated responses following therapy were noted in 73.6% of cases. Neither the choice of chemotherapeutic agent nor the performance of a resection prior to therapy had an impact on patient survival. Although the predominant pattern of relapse was local, 15 patients (30%) had diffuse disease. Conclusions. Antiangiogenic therapy using bevacizumab appears to improve Survival in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma. A possible change in the invasiveness of the tumor following therapy is worrisome and Must be closely monitored. (DOI: 10.3171/2008.4.17492)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available