4.5 Article

Distinct Roles of Dopamine D3 Receptors in Modulating Methamphetamine-Induced Behavioral Sensitization and Ultrastructural Plasticity in the Shell of the Nucleus Accumbens

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages 895-904

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jnr.22821

Keywords

dopamine D3 receptor; methamphetamine; behavioral sensitization; ultrastructural plasticity; nucleus accumbens shell

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30973365]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2009 DFA 31080]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Persistent changes in behavior and psychological function that occur as a consequence of exposure to drugs of abuse are thought to be mediated by the structural plasticity of specific neural circuits such as the brain's dopamine (DA) system. Changes in dendritic morphology in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) accompany drug-induced enduring behavioral and molecular changes, yet ultrastructural changes in synapses following repeated exposure to drugs have not been well studied. The current study examines the role of DA D3 receptors in modulating locomotor activity induced by both acute and repeated methamphetamine (METH) administration and accompanying ultrastructural plasticity in the shell of NAc in mice. We found that D3 receptor mutant (D3(-/-)) mice exhibited attenuated acute locomotor responses as well as the development of behavioral sensitization to METH compared with wild-type mice. In the absence of obvious neurotoxic effects, METH induced similar increases in synaptic density in the shell of NAc in both wild-type and D3(-/-) mice. These results suggest that D3 receptors modulate locomotor responses to both acute and repeated METH treatment. In contrast, the D3 receptor is not obviously involved in modulating baseline or METH-induced ultrastructural changes in the NAc shell. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available