4.5 Article

Minimum Information About Animal Experiments: Supplier Is Also Important

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages 403-407

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jnr.21871

Keywords

SCI; functional recovery; lesion extension; vertebral canal; supplier

Categories

Funding

  1. European Union FP6 rescue strep
  2. Institut pour la Recherche sur la Moelle Epiniere
  3. Societe Francaise de Neurochirurgie
  4. Neureva Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It has now been established that functional recovery after spinal cord injury (SCI) depends on several parameters, including animal strain. Here we demonstrate that rats from the same strain (Wistar) but from two independent commercial suppliers present different motor, sensory, and autonomic outcomes after a standard model of SCI, the so-called compression model. Recovery is correlated with the extension of the lesion, and we show that the vertebral canal diameter varies between the two suppliers. To substantiate this point, we carried out another set of experiments, with the so-called contusion model, which requires bone ablation and thus whose extension is not related to vertebral canal diameter. We show that there is no difference between the two suppliers. The purpose of our communication is to alert researchers on how crucial it is to control experimental parameters as closely as possible and to establish a standard for animal experiment in order to avoid unexpected biases. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available