4.4 Review

Meta-analysis of data from animal studies: A practical guide

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
Volume 221, Issue -, Pages 92-102

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.09.010

Keywords

Meta-analysis; Animal studies; Heterogeneity; Meta-regression; Stratified meta-analysis

Funding

  1. National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs) [NC/L000970/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Meta-analyses of data from human studies are invaluable resources in the life sciences and the methods to conduct these are well documented. Similarly there are a number of benefits in conducting meta-analyses on data from animal studies; they can be used to inform clinical trial design, or to try and explain discrepancies between preclinical and clinical trial results. However there are inherit differences between animal and human studies and so applying the same techniques for the meta-analysis of preclinical data is not straightforward. For example preclinical studies are frequently small and there is often substantial heterogeneity between studies. This may have an impact on both the method of calculating an effect size and the method of pooling data. Here we describe a practical guide for the meta-analysis of data from animal studies including methods used to explore sources of heterogeneity. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available