4.4 Article

Exploration of scanning effects in multi-site structural MRI studies

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
Volume 230, Issue -, Pages 37-50

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.04.023

Keywords

sMRI; Multi-site; ICA; SBM; Multivariate

Funding

  1. Biobanking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure (Netherlands) (BBMRI-NL)
  2. Hersenstichting Nederland
  3. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)
  4. National Institutes of Health [1R01MH094524, R33DA027626, 5P20RR021938/P20GM103472]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Pooling of multi-site MRI data is often necessary when a large cohort is desired. However, different scanning platforms can introduce systematic differences which confound true effects of interest. One may reduce multi-site bias by calibrating pivotal scanning parameters, or include them as covariates to improve the data integrity. New method: In the present study we use a source-based morphometry (SBM) model to explore scanning effects in multi-site sMRI studies and develop a data-driven correction. Specifically, independent components are extracted from the data and investigated for associations with scanning parameters to assess the influence. The identified scanning-related components can be eliminated from the original data for correction. Results: A small set of SBM components captured most of the variance associated with the scanning differences. In a dataset of 1460 healthy subjects, pronounced and independent scanning effects were observed in brainstem and thalamus, associated with magnetic field strength-inversion time and RF-receiving coil. A second study with 110 schizophrenia patients and 124 healthy controls demonstrated that scanning effects can be effectively corrected with the SBM approach. Comparison with existing method(s): Both SBM and GLM correction appeared to effectively eliminate the scanning effects. Meanwhile, the SBM-corrected data yielded a more significant patient versus control group difference and less questionable findings. Conclusions: It is important to calibrate scanning settings and completely examine individual parameters for the control of confounding effects in multi-site sMRI studies. Both GLM and SBM correction can reduce scanning effects, though SBM's data-driven nature provides additional flexibility and is better able to handle collinear effects. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available