4.4 Article

Cutaneous and electrically evoked glutamate signaling in the adult rat somatosensory system

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
Volume 208, Issue 2, Pages 146-154

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.05.013

Keywords

Amperometry; Cutaneous stimulation; Dorsal column nuclei; Electrical stimulation; Microelectrode array; Spinal cord

Funding

  1. Kentucky Spinal Cord and Head Injury Research Trust [9-9]
  2. USPHS [DA 017186]
  3. NSF [EEC-0310723]
  4. DARPA [N66001-09-2080]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glutamate neurotransmission plays critical roles in normal central nervous system (CNS) function, neurodegenerative diseases, and neurotrauma. We determined whether glutamate signaling could be evoked within the anesthetized normal adult rat CNS with clinically relevant peripheral stimulation and recorded (at >1 Hz) with glutamate-sensitive, ceramic microelectrode arrays (MEAs). Basal glutamate levels and both forelimb cutaneous and electrical stimulation-evoked glutamate release were measured within the cuneate nucleus, a relay of the mammalian dorsal columns somatosensory system. The MEAs with triangular, sharp-point tips were more effective at tissue penetration than the flat, blunt tips. Basal glutamate levels of 2.1 +/- 4.4 mu M (mean +/- SD, n = 10 animals) were detected from 150 mu m to 1200 mu m below the brainstem dorsal surface. Cutaneous evoked glutamate signals showed an amplitude of 1.1 +/- 1.1 mu M and a duration of 7.3 +/- 6.5 s (26 signals, n = 6). Electrically evoked signals, like cutaneous ones, were both rapid and slowly rising. Electrically evoked signals, especially those evoked by stimulation trains, were more reproducible and had an amplitude of 1.2 +/- 1.4 mu M, duration of 19.4 +/- 17.3s, and latency from stimulus onset of 21.3 +/- 21.5 s (25 signals, n = 4). In contrast to cutaneous stimulation, glutamate signals evoked by electrical stimulation had longer durations and were recorded primarily in the middle and ventral cuneate nuclei. Importantly, both cutaneous and electrical stimulation of the contralateral forelimb and hindlimbs did not evoke glutamate signaling. With the use of MEAs, these results show, for the first time, somatosensory-pathway specific changes in glutamate levels during peripheral cutaneous and electrical stimulation. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available