4.4 Article

Behaviour of Granger causality under filtering: Theoretical invariance and practical application

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
Volume 201, Issue 2, Pages 404-419

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.08.010

Keywords

Granger causality; Digital filtering; Vector autoregressive modelling; Time series analysis

Funding

  1. Dr. Mortimer and Theresa Sackler Foundation
  2. EPSRC [EP/GOO7543/1]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G007543/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. EPSRC [EP/G007543/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Granger causality (G-causality) is increasingly employed as a method for identifying directed functional connectivity in neural time series data. However, little attention has been paid to the influence of common preprocessing methods such as filtering on G-causality inference. Filtering is often used to remove artifacts from data and/or to isolate frequency bands of interest. Here, we show [following Geweke (1982)] that G-causality for a stationary vector autoregressive (VAR) process is fully invariant under the application of an arbitrary invertible filter; therefore filtering cannot and does not isolate frequency-specific G-causal inferences. We describe and illustrate a simple alternative: integration of frequency domain (spectral) G-causality over the appropriate frequencies (band limited G-causality). We then show, using an analytically solvable minimal model, that in practice G-causality inferences often do change after filtering, as a consequence of large increases in empirical model order induced by filtering. Finally, we demonstrate a valid application of filtering in removing a nonstationary (line noise) component from data. In summary, when applied carefully, filtering can be a useful preprocessing step for removing artifacts and for furnishing or improving stationarity; however filtering is inappropriate for isolating causal influences within specific frequency bands. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available