4.4 Article

Automatic determination of the optimal shape of a surface electrode: Selective stimulation

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
Volume 178, Issue 1, Pages 174-181

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.12.003

Keywords

Multi-pad electrode; Selective stimulation; Grasping; Functional electrical stimulation; Tetraplegia

Funding

  1. The Danish National Research Foundation, Copenhagen, Denmark
  2. Ministry for Science of Serbia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a method for automatic determination of the shape and position of the surface electrode for selective control of fingers extension and flexion by means of electrical stimulation. The multi-pad electrodes used in the experiments comprised 24 pads (1 cm diameter) distributed over an area (7 cm x 10 cm) positioned over dorsal and volar aspects of the forearm. The four-channel stimulation system for grasping comprised also an oval reference electrode over the carpal tunnel, and two oval electrodes over the thenar and thumb extensor muscles. We measured seven angles: proximal inter-phalangeal and metacarpal phalangeal index and ring finger joint rotations, wrist extension/flexion and ulnar/radial rotation, and pronation/supination of the forearm. The optimal electrode was determined as the combination of pads that led to fingers, wrist and forearm rotations being similar to the trajectories of healthy individuals when grasping. The similarity of trajectories was assessed by analyzing the aggregate error defined as the sum of squares of differences between the angles measured when stimulating the forearm in tetraplegics and the angles measured in healthy individuals. The aggregate errors were determined from measurements during sequential stimulation of each of the 24 pads. The analysis comprised hand opening and closing for palmar and lateral grasps. The time for determining the optimal electrode was about 10 min. The optimal electrodes had different branched shapes in each of the six tetraplegics; however, once determined they remained unchanged when tested on different days. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available