4.4 Article

NS21: Re-defined and modified supplement B27 for neuronal cultures

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
Volume 171, Issue 2, Pages 239-247

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.03.013

Keywords

B27 supplement; NS21 supplement; dorsal root ganglion cells; DRG; primary hippocampal cultures; hippocampal neurons; neuronal cultures; retinal ganglion cells; RGC

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [R56 AG013730, RF1 AG013730, AG017502, R01 AG013730, R01 AG013730-06, AG013730, R56 AG017502, R01 AG017502-06A1, R01 AG017502] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [R01 DA015043, R37 DA015043, DA15043, R01 DA015043-06] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [NS035563, R01 NS046450, R01 NS035563-06, NS046450, R01 NS039358, R01 NS035563, R01 NS039358-06, NS039358, R01 NS046450-04] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In vitro culturing of primary neurons is a mainstay of neurobiological research. Many of these culture paradigms have taken advantage of defined culture media rather than serum additives that contain undefined survival factors to facilitate experimental manipulations and interpretation of the results. To culture neurons in the absence of serum, defined supplements such as B27 are now widely used. However, commercially available supplements exhibit large variability in their capabilities to support neurons in culture. Were-optimized and modified earlier published formulations of B27 using 21 different ingredients (NS21). NS21 supports neuronal cultures of high quality as manifested by their morphological characteristics, formation of synapses, and postsynaptic responses. Much of the variability in the quality of B27/NS21 was due to variability in the quality of different sources of bovine serum albumin. Furthermore, we found that holo-transferrin used in NS21 is preferable over apo-transferrin used in B27 for the quality of neuronal cultures. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available