4.4 Article

Navigated TMS combined with EEG in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease:: A pilot study

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
Volume 172, Issue 2, Pages 270-276

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.04.021

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; brain; mild cognitive impairment; navigated brain stimulation; primary motor cortex; evoked response; event-related response

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Our aim was to assess the potential of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-evoked electroencephalographic (EEG) responses in studying neuronal reactivity and cortical connectivity in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and in mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We studied 14 right-handed subjects: five patients with AD, five patients with MCI and four healthy controls. Fifty TMS-pulses at an intensity of 110% of individually determined motor threshold were delivered to the hand area of primary motor cortex (M[1) with navigated brain stimulation (NBS). Spreading of primary NBS-evoked neuronal activity was monitored with a compatible 60-channel EEG, and analyzed in time, frequency and spatial-domains. We found significantly reduced TIMS-evoked P30 (time-locked response 30 ms after the magnetic stimulation) in the AD subjects. This reduction was seen in the temporo-parietal area ipsilateral to stimulation side as well as in the contralateral fronto-central cortex corresponding to the sensorimotor network, which is anatomically interconnected with the stimulated M1. In addition, there was a significant decrease in the N100 amplitude in the MCI subjects when compared with the control subjects. Thus, the combination of NBS and EEG revealed prominent changes in functional cortical connectivity and reactivity in the AD subjects. This pilot study suggests that the method may provide a novel tool for examining the degree and progression of dementia. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available