4.4 Article

Continuous high-frequency stimulation in freely moving rats:: Development of an implantable microstimulation system

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
Volume 167, Issue 2, Pages 278-291

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.08.019

Keywords

activated iridium; electrodes; experimental high-frequency stimulation; implantable microstimulator; neuronal tissue damage; Parkinson's disease; subthalamic nucleus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-frequency stimulation (HFS) of basal ganglia and thalamic nuclei is an established treatment for various movement disorders and has recently been extended to other neuro-psychiatric conditions. Numerous experimental studies in small laboratory animals provided important insights in the mode of action of HFS. However, the interpretation of the results is often limited by the use of short-term HFS, while patients receive continuous stimulation for many years. One reason is the lack of an established model for the application of long-term HFS in small animals. Therefore, we thought to develop an implantable microstimulation system for small laboratory animals and to establish a protocol for Iona-term HFS by defining non-damaging stimulus parameters with respect to brain integrity. For this purpose, we designed a miniaturized, microcontroller-based, and programmable microstimulator that allows the reliable application of continuous HFS for up to 5 weeks. Chronic HFS (total stimulation time: 3 weeks) of the subthalamic nucleus with up to 100 mu A (5.2 nC/phase) through monopolar electrodes comprising activated iridium did not induce significant tissue damage as assessed by various histological techniques (Nissl's. hematoxylin and eosin, Kluver-Barrera, van Gieson's staining, NeuN and GFAP-immunoreactivity). In conclusion, chronic HFS with an implantable stimulator can be successfully applied in small animals. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available